Forum Closed
The forum is now to new posts. All the historical content is still available to browse.
if you are looking for musicians to play with, please view the Bands Seeking Musicians list, or use the Musicians Directory
You can use our pages on social media to connect:
gear question
| Message Board > Gear Buy & Sell > gear question |
| I dunno | What are the pro's and con's of removing my pu covers off my '99 stock les paul standard?? - Sat, 28 Dec 2002 9:58pm | ||
| Anonymous | why? would you want to ? - Sun, 29 Dec 2002 12:50am | ||
| Joey HiFi User Info... | As far as I know (though there is much debate) it won't really make much difference at all sonically. It will however be easier to get your beer in there. Just take 'em off and see - you can always put 'em back. - Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:30pm | ||
| Tycho Brahe | I hear it brightens the tone a bit, but i've only ever played my Les Paul without the covers and I love the tone. - Tue, 31 Dec 2002 4:47pm | ||
| Anonymous | joey hifi is a poser - Wed, 1 Jan 2003 1:20pm | ||
| Joey HiFi User Info... | Mom? - Thu, 2 Jan 2003 2:50pm | ||
| Guru User Info... | It makes a slight difference. I took the cover off my bridge(lead) pickup and it gives just that little bit more output and treble to it. I love the way it sounds and am defenitly keeping the cover off. I would keep the cover on the rhythm pickup though, sounds classier that way. - Fri, 3 Jan 2003 1:29pm | ||
| Zippgunn User Info... | The main difference is that it makes it easier to break it. If you want more treble then turn the treble up, duh. All the guitar tech nuts I know recommend you leave them alone. - Wed, 29 Jan 2003 2:35pm | ||
| Tycho Brahe | If that were the case, Scott, then why would Gibson produce Pauls without the covers? - Thu, 30 Jan 2003 1:48pm | ||
| Anonymous | no one who plays the guitar that well is a poseur..you're just jealous mom - Fri, 31 Jan 2003 8:18am | ||
|
|||
Not logged in
Log In / Register (optional)
